Discussion:
Happiness: It is Africans who are affected by marihuana, THC smoking
(too old to reply)
Fabrizio J Bonsignore
2010-10-24 15:23:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
The situation is perverse and has to be pieced together piece by
piece, but ultimately it makes sense, perversely. First it has to be
admitted they are weak and schizophrenic so it is very easy to
interfere their thought patterns... this is not readily noticeable for
people living in hoods (neighborhoods) as when they *hear* and say
what they hear, they look and feel as being very well informed only!
But when you are passing through a place but they begin informing you
and acting on what they hear... it is impossible they know as local
gossip only! It becomes evident then if they hear something, they feel
something too.

The argument is that homeless, African homeless, do not want to feel
well (sic). If they feel well they do not realize they are homeless
because they should be feeling bad. The hidden assumption is that if
they feel bad in their situation, they would do something to change
it! Furthermore, another hidden assumption is that if they do
something to change their situation, they will make it change (for the
better)... but that is not true either.

So if someone, anyone, is feeling OK and they are *feeling it*, that
person is at fault and blamed by Africans and homeless alike of
deceiving them (fraud) and holding them! This includes of course
children, girls, monied people, lovers, succeesful people, healthy
people, thinkers, scientists, pregnant women... anyone who would be
feeling well and OK and, as it was said as flattery, RADIANT (of
HAPPINESS). I of course have such self esteem that I feel well with
myself, so those poor sods just keep making *gestures* around me to
change such selfsatisfaction!

It follows that people have to feel BAD, distressed, stressed,
anguished, hopeless, fearful, diseased, restless, beaten, defeated...
so that Africas and homeless FEEL _OK_ BY FEELING BAD, what they are
supposed to feel bad in their circumstance! This means they want to
feel BAD or they do not realize they are homeless! The argument is
fallaceous, but some charity souls and some order enforcers might buy
it... then *help* Africans and homeless by locating the people they
point at and makeing them SUFFER it all... so those poor Africans and
homeless can feel BAD and do SOMETHING!

The situation is also perverse because the argument can be confused
with ENVY, JEALOUSY and get the help of resources from jealous people.
Africans and homeless perceived as jealous but in fact they have a
hidden argument and a fallacy, so if they find a jealous person...
they have a real tool against happy people...

Danilo J Bonsignore
Fabrizio J Bonsignore
2010-10-24 15:25:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
The underlying fallaceous assumption is that if Africans, by making
them feel bad through somebody else s distress, would actually do
something to alleviate their condition because they are realizing it,
THEN they would stop having the need to feel BAD (through others
unhappiness) by acquiring material wealth... and order would be
finally restored. But this is false! Such argument is in fact a
potential differential where the happy person losses her wealth in
favor of Africans and is expected to GIVE to them what she has, so
they be content, THEN she is expected to accumulate again so balance
is restored... but it does not work, it is actually an extortion, even
if it is hidden in several socially accepted ways, like subisidies,
charity, aid...

The real problem is the very basic and normal hidden assumption that
Africans and homeless want to ultimately feel WELL, that they want
to_be_ HAPPY... but that is NOT TRUE. In a way they already confessed:
they want to feel BAD because... but this because is a non sequitur
and ultimately is an excuse only though it allows them to express the
truth: THEY WANT TO FEEL BAD.

And here it is where perversion and paradox can be realized: they want
to feel BAD because that way they feel WELL!!!

It is easy to understand by posing the proper setting to the problem.
**In the middle of the paths of life, I found myself in a dark
jungle...**, Dante went so famous by these words because they are TRUE
and unfortunately they are expected to be true (and justify) many
people s life s situations, so instead of saying Life Begins at Forty,
we speak of the Middle Age Crisis! The dark jungle is the right
setting. Against, in, a dark jungle, you are not expected to feel
safe, relaxed, happy, or you would miss the dangers in OVERCONFIDENCE.
The right emotional tone has to be distress, anguish, alertness, alarm
to be prepared to confront the dangers... or FLEE THEM, which actually
is a more sensible reaction to dark jungle threats!

They have all rights to feel OK when they feel DISTRESSED!

Feeling distressed in a dark jungle is correct because it saves and
prolongs your life; feeling relaxed at ease is incorrect because your
life can finish just then and there by any unexpected dark jungle
danger. Such qualifying OK is a second level term, it is the spark of
self consciousness or objective judge monitoring internal states to
bring about any corrections needed but it is different from the
internal states themself we call emotion(al tone).

Danilo J Bonsignore
Fabrizio J Bonsignore
2010-10-24 15:42:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
So that is the trick and the lie and the root of the problem. When
somebody (external) is feeling well, OK, relaxed, Africans and
homeless are feeling *well* by schizophrenic spillover effect... then
_their_ internal judge tells them they are NOT OK, because their
natural setting is a **dark jungle**, NOT a civilized, prosperous,
safe CITY ! If they feel OK they do not feel OK! If they fell NOT OK,
then they are OK. So in order to make an African homeless feel OK it
has to feel NOT OK. But since they admit their emotional states come
from what somebody else is feeling, then you, they, HAVE to make
people feel BAD!!! And not because they are homeless but because they
HAVE to feel bad to be appeased, alert, ready to FLEE the least danger
to save their lives as it is normal in **dark jungles** or feral
savannahs.

The consequence is obvious: crime, disease, disasters, murder, theft,
yells and shouts in the street, insecurity, terrorist attacks, police
state, repression, corpses exhibited in the street, gangs, bad city
maintainance, rapes, accidents, noise polution, bad news, war... so
that people feel BAD and anguished to make Africans feel bad but OK.

This is a TRAP: People are blamed (self blame) of loss of control,
crisis, Human Nature, dictatorships... such a bleak picture that we
cannot throw the first stone, even when such crisis can and actually
are triggered by external factors, some of the under control of that
bad argument. So Africans (think they) can lawfully say: **But you are
BEASTS! Europe and America have been at war always! You are no better,
you do not have the moral credit to criticize us, you are SAVAGES and
BEASTS (while we are all peaceful and meek and hungered and poor and
victimized [by you]). If you give us what you have (material wealth),
you would see...**. FALSE.

It is paradoxic. When Africans (and all other Excrement Color
Anthropoids) are appeased and peaceful, it is because some Human is
feeling bad. When they are most relaxed, materially relaxed, they go
excited, anguished and begin looking for excuses to cause harm because
it is not their natural state. If African homeless can more or less
coexist without too much conflict is because THEY ARE FEELING
THREATENED therefore FEELING OK: they become peaceful. But when
Africans go into raucus and mobs and disorder and conflictsit is
because there ARE HAPPY PEOPLE and Africans cannot stand THEIR
RESULTING ANGUISH. This happened in the sixties when modern material
wealth begun growing. It happened in the 80s in California when people
were realizing computing wealth. It happens here and there like in the
Wal Mart mob and other not so famous such lynchings. 9/11 is such
example, as is the war in Iraq, even the Zapatista conflict too and
other such conflicts.

Danilo J Bonsignore
Fabrizio J Bonsignore
2010-10-24 15:44:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Africans and homeless do not want happy people because happy people
makes them feel BAD in se. Envy is an easy world to describe this
interdependence, but not the right word to RECOGNIZE the problem
because many Africans would NOT be perceived as suffering envy when
they DO have most basic satisfactors solved. This is the basic FACT.

Simultaneously relaxed and distressed... it seems impossible and
paradoxic but it can be solved more than one way, to the point that
such alternation of emotional states would also be **judged**,
(internalized), and felt as anguish, a different state. Anguish is
known to paralyze; existencial angst is purely African and
schizophrenic when feelings spillover. Several cross polution dynamics
can follow, but for Africans such anguish is indeed the anguish of not
being ready to confront the dangers of the dark jungles that are
connatural to them.

See how this is determinant for the ban on drugs. Africans cannot
stand and cannot allow people from feeling WELL through external
control substances because then THEY will feel anguished,
independently of how well solved any user may have his own life, even
after decades of effort (Africans do not travel in vacations, do
they?). (some) Drugs have to be BANNED because they are not poisons
(it happened with alcohol, remember?), otherwise they just go
discontinued and nobody would think of using them. But THEN there is
an excuse to STRESS and pressure people who would look like using
them, because they are content, because they are happy, because they
cause no problems, because they are in Nirvana, and an excuse to
THREATEN all people with the war on drugs (clever misnomer), the
danger of drugs, their mere existence... and to justify violence as
being the result of drugs, ignoring any other more likely cause. THEN,
people can feel distressed, threatened, wary, worried, with a ghostly
problem because it is HIDDEN... but making Africans feel OK by feeling
such distress and fulfilling their natural, expected, emotional tone.
It is no surprise either that medicinal drugs are given to OLD PEOPLE:
if they DO produce a good effect, marihuana being the most relevant
case, some Excrement Color Anthropoid might be expected to make itself
present and rid the world of the very likely diseased but enduring
(and maybe obnoxious) old man because it is actually relaxing...

There are other much better solutions to banning. But the ban fulfills
several conditions to hide the African-Excrement Color Anthropoid
problem: take away controllable enjoyment, produce specific
restlessnesses, keep a hidden threat, have scapegoats, justify
thieves...

Cleverly enough, law criminalizes dealers (sellers), possession, but
not consumption, because otherwise the joyful people would not be
found! And dealers are... Africans, because they want to find such
people and kill them. So such law is actually giving a chance to
Africans to seek and murder people who want to naturally feel well and
experiment what is NOT perceived as a real danger... save for the ban
part, of course.

Danilo J Bonsignore
Fabrizio J Bonsignore
2010-10-24 15:46:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
(This point of view is based on a biological model of how life
differentiates dominant and dominated lifeforms, predated and
predator, so this text is not gratuituous.)

See the problem against the Iraq war context: in the middle of the
computing boom, a group of excrement color anthropoids suddenly decide
to ATTACK a more or less peaceful city and a country in peace. THEN
they have an excuse to mobilize... a military force that is composed
(full of) Africans! So now the whole country has an **excuse** to go
into distress, danger, repression and low level conflict, to partially
disable the police, to witchhunt, to dissappear people, happy people,
take them out of their context, send them to war dangers... But it was
a buch of EXCREMENT COLOR ANTHROPOIDS who caused an unexpected
conflict to have another bunch of Excrement Color Anthropoids engage
in aggressive and violent behaviours... and dissappear the happy
people who were leading, directing and enjoying a prosperous boom
based on technology advancements (they cannot produce, no matter how
hard they FIGHT to position themselves into it). The happy people
gone, terorism entered the picture, it was not an accident but a
reason to go into distress and alarm... as if we were in a dark jungle
full on UNCONTROLABLE threats and dangers. Actually, an excuse to seek
the happy people and destroy their happiness, because Africans ARE
schizophrenically perceiving THEM, HAPPY.

And this is how badly this biological error claps close: once the
feeling-bad-because-feeling-OK Africans beats down the person who was
joyful, NOW he has a reason to feel distressed, threatened,
persecuted, endangered, HUNTED, justified... and OK-by-feeling-bad.

Of course, it is another problem that Africans besides blame
EVERYTHING that THEY are schizophrenic, and their brains are
interfered by almost anyone and everything more intelligent than they
are, (with the probably exclusion of the Chinese), which if it did not
exist... if it did not accumulate... if there were not SO MANY of them
feeling well and relaxed and happy...

It should be evident I am taking African, homeless, Excrement Color
Anthropoid: Hindi, Africans, Indians, Hybrids, Mexicans, Arabs,
Aborigines, even schizophrenic, as more or less synonimous. Human
schizophrenics do get poluted and exhibit some such African traits, so
they can be used as agents, but the fact is that this problem of
feeling-bad-if-feeling-OK is an aberration associated (due) to
excrement color skin being the color of its own excrement, which is
the easiest and best way to describe the conflicting group. Chinese
are another problem regarding emotions (the inscrutable Chinese), but
they support Africans in their struggle quite well.

[An addendum: the ancillary argument of ...giving it to children...
does not apply, for the simple reason that children are already
(quite) happy and do not need them! I think this is perceived
naturally by Humans, but not by interested banners who are the ones
who ACTUALLY pose the matter...]

Danilo J Bonsignore
Fabrizio J Bonsignore
2010-10-24 15:47:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
This is in reply to a mis-statement in Ferry Staten Island
loudspeakers where they imply they actually allow smoking... then
disallow it, so the FBI is the ONLY relevant group of interest,
because of a complex series of arguments, assumptions, statements,
agendas, part of which IS the initial argument discredited and exposed
clearly in this text. But I still invite them to drink their five soda
beverages on a row containing 800% of daily requirements of vitamin B
complex to SEE what is DISABLING.

**Why! If Humans evolved under fire and smoke! As if we were not
resilient to smoke...**

Danilo J Bonsignore
Fabrizio J Bonsignore
2010-10-24 23:48:39 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
(Brin QUITATE ladron) Of course these considerations are assumed for
naturally born and not color modified people. It does not have to be
true of PAINTED people. Now you know what is a nigger: it is a Human
painted to look the color of excrement. I believe the recipe goes
through a melting pot of chosen Human remains, cooked to the point of
caramel then used to fully bathe people; the natural sugars, collagen
and other substances, melted under slow fire, would produce a hard to
clean pigment that can be absorb by the skin to fix it... which of
course is unnecessary if Excrement Color Anthropoids are banned to
begin with precisely because of that abuse possibility becoming
normal. A such painted Human is treated like African by Humans and as
a Nigger by Africans, but it also produces a lot of AGGRESSIVITY
because Humans have a different disposition towards excrement, and is
used of course to hide the differences between the two species.

This is also an issue for Africans skin cleaned with lupus passing as
blondes (dyed hair) or albinos (older). And for people burned with
vitamins beyond what a natural tan can produce or undo after skin
peels. Incidentally it is also an issue with people going through
facial lifts to lose Chinese features, including chock-chock ones
(cuts in the scalp to pull back facial skin and muscles).
INCIDENTALLY, the issue is also artificial blue eyes produced by
burning or artificial glaucomas. What is discussed here is valid for
people naturally born their skin color.

Danilo J Bonsignore
Fabrizio J Bonsignore
2010-11-12 00:05:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Note that this bad cross condition leads to a kind of 2/3-1/3 model,
where the final influence of Human happiness over Africans is such
that, because of the inverse relationship of not being dominant life
form, they stabilize at 2/3 or 1/3 of actual hysteria (fear) or actual
aggression, on average, since the moment they feel bad because some
joyful (normal) Human state affects them, they fall into their natural
state of aprehension, which provides soothness, then nothing happens,
so they pick up again the trasmitted joyful (natural) state of
successfully Human, then... It is a spring dampening model of internal
states, indeed, leading to very interesting, though unnecessary,
dynamics.

And to think the same happens with alcohol... it is understandable the
Muslim ban of alcohol and the Prohibition years when the African
population begun booming without control in the USA.

Danilo J Bonsignore
Fabrizio J Bonsignore
2010-11-12 18:47:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Of course it makes a lot of sense. When Man learneth Fire... we must
have triggered big, enormous woodfires and while forcing the Excrement
Color Anthropoid down the tree and changeth it, we also **discovered**
useful knowledge about plants, cooking, fire, smoke, among them
tobacco, incense and maybe others we have already forgotten about...
Discover here means that some of it gave us survival advantages
associated to fire so those who took advantage of it progressed and
left offspring, while those who could not assimilate it had difficult
times and laggered and became few and fewer. It also must have forced
strong negative associations in other anthropoidal species against
smoke and fire. The problem though is that if those species we served
ourselves with were big trees taking aeons to grow up but fired down
in hours... while we burneth them they loathed them so now how many
Christmas trees are LEFT like the one in the Rockefeller Center this
year and pictured in the Daily News...?

If to grow a pumpking up to the size of house it takes five hundred
years, will never again see such convenient houses again. Nor mature
trees since it is more valuable and beneficial to grow immediate
gratification species with short reproduction cycles than to wait with
it and against the rest of everybody for long term, long run, slow
grow rates mature big plants like trees, or even some WEEDS we do not
even let grow into full mature TREES to see what they would bring us
from the PAST. See what I mean?

Danilo J Bonsignore
Fabrizio J Bonsignore
2010-11-20 02:28:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
This links to the African species semantic, the liver pate and the
Humans judge by form threads. Will post links later...

Danilo J Bonsignore
Fabrizio J Bonsignore
2010-12-22 13:03:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
TRICKY, EH? This discussion continued in kibology but not here! Here
1) All living humans are of African descent if you go back far enough.
My own model difers. It points to the Polinesia region as the most
Doesn't jibe with DNA distribution patterns. Heard of Mendel?
likely pond where Humans evolved. Africa is but a politically correct
original territory, but my own model again can refute it on the basis
of several dynamics. Particularly, underwater cemeteries, massacres
and the uberimportant social handling of remains would cover the true
original territory far more than boneologists would care to admit.
I don't care about bones so much as DNA, although tooth crowns are
illuminating.

Interpreting ancestry by perceived cultural markers is at least
"subjective".


Do you know how to knap flint, grow melons, tie a fly?
So... how many HUMAN bones do you expect to find in a kitchen s pile
of ANIMAL bones left behind for future archeologists to wonder about?
What,today?
Would they be recognized?
Human bones are pretty easy to differentiate from others.
2) Nearly all modern humans, *except* those whose ancestors are all of
recent (since the last Out Of Africa migration) African origin, have
Neandertal genes. That is the sole possible physically verifiable
I remember quite well my pictures of Homo javaniensis, and believe me,
there ARE such jaws in the common population, and quite marked. One of
the last facts news d is that DNA looks more like a hoarder s closet
than an accountant s archive; Human DNA would be more **fluid** than
it looks on the long run, but we are still under the spell of very
lineal evolutionary paths, no regressions, etc.
No "spell" that I know of. Cause and effects of frinst "The
Hapsburg
Lip" and the Jukes family's... issues aren't kept secret.
basis for any form of racism. You on the other hand try to elevate
some imaginary form of "white" to the status of ideal True Human and
My approach is PATHOLOGY: the color of excrement is a pathology,
In what sense? (oTTo, look away)

http://www.medicinenet.com/stool_color/article.htm


Excrement's color is largely due to bilirubin content, a product of
the liver.


Excrement with no bilirubin in it at all is steel-grey. That
indicates pathological bile blockage.
anything else remains undefined and **does not matter**, so we do not
need to define white at all! But we CAN use image processing
Attempts have been made to quantize skin color:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Luschan%27s_chromatic_scale
techniques to compare skin colors to excrement colors and derive
consequences of how such differences or lack of them would be
processed actually by baby growing brains.
Skin color is due to melanin, not a product of the liver.

Skin color variation is not affected by bilirubin in the skin, in
the absence of pathology of the liver.


As most people do not suffer liver pathologies, I don't see a
physical channel of causation to support your approach.


What correlation do you see; what physical mechanism connects
bilirubin and melatonin for you?


Since in your approach skin melantonin concentration is a defect,
the one with no melatonin at all wins, right?


"spiders are one of the few animal groups in which it has not been
detected"


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melanin


I, for one, welcome our new arachnid overlords.
relegate all others (your soi-disant "excrement-colored") to sub-human
Uh, subhuman superanimals would be more accurate, but I am still
So to you they're not so much "subhuman" as "nonhuman".

You just don't get it.


*They're* the sole remaining "true human" gene pool, the rest of us
(Asians, Europeans, yada yada) are *halfbreeds* of humans and
neandertals.
pushed three or more times a day by African people who cannot respect
by almost permanent turtle shell backpack, so if that is not a
tropism...
What's your locale's percentage population of Polynesians? Native
Americans? Etc? IOW are you seeing a geographic artifact? Gang
population? You wearing the wrong colors?

Sounds like an environmental adaptation problem to me, not a racial
theory.
status. Your so-called Whites share Neandertal genes with Asians,
Australians, New Guineans, Native Americans and so on but not with
Africans.
Then there IS also a spread of genes that differs according to
competition, I mean, race. It is scientific culture (I have it from
economics), that you point out facts... then wait and hope for the
politician or agent to abright itself and derive the RIGHT consequence
and acts from that fact.
There's waiting/hoping, and then there's predicting behaviors.

Right and wrong are not absolutes in secular culture. I don't live
in a religious culture and don't want to.
IMO it is possible to build a self-consistent form of racism
based on that, but I doubt you'd be able to adapt to it.
Care elaborating?
See above about "humans" and "halfbreeds".

Me, I'm from old German and Portuguese peasant stock. Know anything
about the distribution of neandertals?
3) You never got around to marijuana.
??? The real objective distinction is between poisons and drugs!
(snip)

It's not an XOR distinction.
There is plenty of leeway to experiment, but
experimentation is a HUMAN function, not a fixed animal species
function and it does have quite subtle semantics.
Philosophers like to think that only humans have ideals against
which to compare reals.

I watch Stellars' Jays in my front yard compare peanuts by
sequentially picking them up and rattling them, then picking the
"best".


Observation trumps semantics every time.
NOW I think Africans have an average IQ of around 45
What's your I. Q.?

-> The replier Dr. Hot"135 at age 12, now 58- you do the math"Salt

Danilo J Bonsignore
Fabrizio J Bonsignore
2010-12-22 13:05:05 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Sorry, tiring to reply like ... do, punch by punch... new model vs
politically correct model.
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
1) All living humans are of African descent if you go back far enough.
My own model difers. It points to the Polinesia region as the most
Doesn't jibe with DNA distribution patterns. Heard of Mendel?
You hear. Mendel. You did not read well. Massacres. I have two or
three GENERATIONS of raped women relatives delivering mulato
relatives: all those seem quite well and alive, all mothers seem to
be
quite... no longer available. But basically this domino game seems to
have gone through too many soup shuffles, so what would be affecting
DNA distributions...? Exactly what do you mean? Big concept meaning
too much and nothing.
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
likely pond where Humans evolved. Africa is but a politically correct
I don't care about bones so much as DNA, although tooth crowns are
illuminating.
Miss the point.
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
Interpreting ancestry by perceived cultural markers is at least
"subjective".
It is the other way around.
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
Do you know how to knap flint, grow melons, tie a fly?
Of course... tie a fly?
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
Human bones are pretty easy to differentiate from others.
Probably it was not kitchen bones, but a foetus skeleton puzzle what
I
DID report. It is true but bone images are everywhere (in school) and
before schools existed...
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
2) Nearly all modern humans, *except* those whose ancestors are all of
I remember quite well my pictures of Homo javaniensis, and believe me,
No "spell" that I know of. Cause and effects of frinst "The Hapsburg
Lip" and the Jukes family's... issues aren't kept secret.
Also leukemias and other rare diseases... but they are very easily
KEPT SECRET IN THEIR ORIGIN when it is the court s WITCH who is
applying a schizophrenically given cannibal recipe. In that I am
ADAMANT: I still have one finger knuckle turned around I did not have
before coming to NYC, and it does mean Sicilian mafia.
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
basis for any form of racism. You on the other hand try to elevate
some imaginary form of "white" to the status of ideal True Human and
My approach is PATHOLOGY: the color of excrement is a pathology,
In what sense? (oTTo, look away)
Already explained above.
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
Excrement's color is largely due to bilirubin content, a product of
the liver.
Excrement with no bilirubin in it at all is steel-grey. That
indicates pathological bile blockage.
REALLY?! That is why it IS such a popular Mexican song word? Sorry,
but in my whole life I cant remember EVER confusing my legs with my
excreta when turning down if at all, only after this NYC experience I
already narrated I begun thinking on how to insult them... and it
happened it is IMPOSSIBLE. But you can GRIN to them though 8D
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
anything else remains undefined and **does not matter**, so we do not
need to define white at all! But we CAN use image processing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Luschan%27s_chromatic_scale
Indeed... but it does not matter. The math I envision is quite much
more complex than quantizing but I am sure it can be make very
statistical precise up to the engineering level.
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
techniques to compare skin colors to excrement colors and derive
consequences of how such differences or lack of them would be
processed actually by baby growing brains.
Skin color is due to melanin, not a product of the liver.
Skin color variation is not affected by bilirubin in the skin, in
the absence of pathology of the liver.
As most people do not suffer liver pathologies, I don't see a
physical channel of causation to support your approach.
Would be selection and mimesis actually, natural, intrasocial and
intersocial.
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
Since in your approach skin melantonin concentration is a defect,
the one with no melatonin at all wins, right?
You mean Africans changing color with LUPUS? I can see no difference
between albinos and lupus d Africans though I am supposed to believe
in the works of anonymous doctors and researchers who never thought
they can be anticipated and their results BIASED systematically from
BEFORE they begin the research! Particularly in pre-computer times.
Like in, the baby was born African not because a defect or recessive
genes, but because the MIDWIFE has a LOT of EXPERIENCE in exchanging
growing foetuses among will be mothers. Did you think of THAT? I
already did, why not them who want to keep a SECRET and truth away
from TRUTH?
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
"spiders are one of the few animal groups in which it has not been
detected"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melanin
You are the NON COLOR!!! A result was precisely finding a
relationship
between Africans and spiders Humans do not have. No need to mention
them here.
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
I, for one, welcome our new arachnid overlords.
relegate all others (your soi-disant "excrement-colored") to sub-human
Uh, subhuman superanimals would be more accurate, but I am still
So to you they're not so much "subhuman" as "nonhuman".
I am telling you there is no way to insult excrement! Make fearful
maybe (needed) but insult? I do not consider them Human on principle,
for the simple reason that I cannot stand their smell nor the touch
of
their skins, so thinking of having sex with one of their females is
just an opium dream. It goes down. Would require real precautions! No
arousal, etc. That is a condition for speciation. Though it seems
they
DID dare paint a woman I love their color to keep her away from me
with one of their exemplars.
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
You just don't get it.
My phrase.
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
*They're* the sole remaining "true human" gene pool, the rest of us
(Asians, Europeans, yada yada) are *halfbreeds* of humans and
neandertals.
HA! See how well you proposed your SUPERIORITY? THAT IS MY POINT! Now
ECAs are The Human but they could invent neither chairs nor tables!
Now you have to define Human and True. So maybe it is Neandertals
what
I call Humans. And Tolkien Hobbits were actually Oaxacans so
halfbreeds would fall in Cabo de Hornos or maybe where the Chichi-
meca
(slang s breast Eden). That is why I went through an objective
comparison because if you DO live smeared in your own excrement your
life quality will be quite low, to say the least.
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
pushed three or more times a day by African people who cannot respect
What's your locale's percentage population of Polynesians? Native
Americans? Etc? IOW are you seeing a geographic artifact? Gang
population? You wearing the wrong colors?
Multiculturalism is a problem. I was never before pushed that way.
Maybe they are all connected through voices? I think there would be
an
atavic link (selective adaptation) to turtles, though those animal
links are hard to prove, similar to tame/feral vs wild animals.
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
status. Your so-called Whites share Neandertal genes with Asians,
Australians, New Guineans, Native Americans and so on but not with
Africans.
Interesting... Which ones and what do they encode? Another point to
my
Speciation thesis.
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
Then there IS also a spread of genes that differs according to
There's waiting/hoping, and then there's predicting behaviors.
I am easily predictable, some people ensured that against my will.
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
IMO it is possible to build a self-consistent form of racism
based on that, but I doubt you'd be able to adapt to it.
Care elaborating?
See above about "humans" and "halfbreeds".
No reply.
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
Me, I'm from old German and Portuguese peasant stock. Know anything
about the distribution of neandertals?
German would mean Arab while Portuguese is actually Mulato? And you
hear voices. Would be a very bad case indeed... 8D But mind the swap
baby phenomenon! See, can you tell easily if your skin is smeared
with
excrement under normal conditions? That is what matters here.
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
3) You never got around to marijuana.
??? The real objective distinction is between poisons and drugs!
It's not an XOR distinction.
Marihuana I prefer to call THC. For most purposes there is an XOR, we
do not have to fall into fuzzy logic and continuums always. But again
in my model it SEEMS that it has been AROUND for so long we evolved
around it in more than one way.
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
There is plenty of leeway to experiment, but
experimentation is a HUMAN function, not a fixed animal species
function and it does have quite subtle semantics.
Philosophers like to think that only humans have ideals against
which to compare reals.
No idea. I do have changing, adaptable expectations with a few fuses
turned hardwire.
Post by Fabrizio J Bonsignore
NOW I think Africans have an average IQ of around 45
What's your I. Q.?
Above average, that s enough to know, though I consider myself more
intelligent for not joining MENSA nor the other societies despite my
successful **exams** d8D

Danilo J Bonsignore
Fabrizio J Bonsignore
2010-12-22 13:05:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
BY THE WAY: I did find that CHINESE, you know? The guys with half
closed eyes who look like morons and Down syndromes and other similar
syndromes despite having some particularly attractive females and
speak in long monosyllabic phrases with inflexions while striving
more
at painting that writing when writing? They are the equivalent of
fish, are technological thieves and it was Occidentals who had to go
to China in the past, far gone past, to give them government while
leaving behind a strain of people. This is not gratuituous, but the
ANALYSIS is still in privately sent emails. NO bad feelings (no
feelings at all here), it is not personal (very impersonal, indeed),
it is not an opinion but based on analysis. I do consider a big
theoretical moment when I discovered miniatur(ization) in the
analysis
the day before I read about Mao and discover... he had to give them
FREEDOM TO USE BIG LETTERINGS. **Be what you are not, come on, try it
out...**. In fact, I think it has been such influence what deprived
my
family of more than ONE industrial emporium and is still the reason I
am writing this here instead of achieving more productive and
interesting matters..

Chinese do not want drugs, but do experiment with cannibally for very
clear reasons in the model. But since it all says they are also
naturally schizophrenic, they may be quite prone to act like Africans
do regarding the experienced well being of Humans.


Danilo J Bonsignore
Fabrizio J Bonsignore
2011-01-07 20:10:16 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Was followed in the alt.religion.kibology group, a software
programmers s group.

Danilo J Bonsignore
Fabrizio J Bonsignore
2011-01-12 01:23:55 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
That Zambia forbid Diphenhydramine HCL as a controlled substance when
I can buy it in any pharmacy, but not antibiotics, is a best example
of this thread s matter of fact. It was forbidden in Zambia because it
produces a state of relaxation without ANXIETY. It is the relaxation
that Africans perceive schizophrenically and makes them feel...
PEACEFULLY ANXIOUS. It is a danger of murder to take this medicine in
Zambia! Would affect the whole schizophrenic society making them RELAX
because one Human used it, that is, making Zambians AFRICAN ANXIOUS.

Danilo J Bonsignore
Fabrizio J. Bonsignore syntotic
2013-10-31 22:46:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
THIS IS A VERY LONG CROSS POSTED THREAD, I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY IT IS NOT POSTED COMPLETELY HERE IN NY.GENERAL. Forget the _tone, it is science and an introduction.

Halloween 2013, this post should be last in the thread. VERY bad issue to post here now that these groups are unreliable and not trustworthy (cannot cross-post).

See how it works: if (pregnant) women who use THC produce babies who do not *hear* voices, that is, NORMAL, Africans who *hear* voices naturally by birth will produce babies who do not *hear*, but it is the way Africans have to learn language so their babies will not learn! When you mix both populations in studies, it will appear incorrectly as THC producing mental retardation, when in fact it is only Africans who **forfeited** their natural need to *hear* voices (schizophrenia) to learn (otherwise slowed)... Once the incorrect inference is applied to Humans and sustained, they start producing babies *hearing* voices since birth, ie, equated to Africans! But in the Human species it is psychosis and the sense of Self will not develop if the Human individual does not grow without ever *hearing* voices!!!

The Hippie (hip-py) generation did produce a generation, despite their massacre, that produced or did not obstruct much these developments, computing, aircrafts, rock and roll, skyscrapers, internet, which required lots of individual individuals (pleonasm is valid) to achieve. Following generations would suffer from the inter-species confusion in studies and even everyday common knowledge.


Danilo J Bonsignore
Danilo Jose Bonsignore
2015-02-01 05:05:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Worse, now I am convinced THC was instrumental in the evolution of Man and a major factor for migrations away from the original habitats as food sources were extinguished and LEARNING FIRE revealed a new source. Human is the animal who smokes (spontaneously) with full abilities to do so. No other living form smokes nor is adapted to do so*.

In fact, I suspect THC is very akin in effect and uses to ASPIRIN and the analogy is quite strict, particularly, no amount of aspirin can suppress strong pains and an aspirin a day, (and omitting it too), is a practice with no harmful side effects.

It is important now that I am having trouble finding some SPICES, common food spices since the trend is to EXTINGUISH rather than to protect, and to hide as intermediate products rather than exploit as consumer products when the effect is _pleasurable_ or _medicinal_. Should THC be defeated... what spice or useful plant would follow? I have heard threats even against SUGAR... Some MAJOR such plants and spices might have already been forgotten, extinguished or hidden before we had a well spread formal nomenclature, mainly in the transition between the 1500s-1700s and the more modern 1800s.

Considering pleasure seems to be a goal only among Humans... Europeans...
Post by Fabrizio J. Bonsignore syntotic
THIS IS A VERY LONG CROSS POSTED THREAD, I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY IT IS NOT POSTED COMPLETELY HERE IN NY.GENERAL. Forget the _tone, it is science and an introduction.
Halloween 2013, this post should be last in the thread. VERY bad issue to post here now that these groups are unreliable and not trustworthy (cannot cross-post).
See how it works: if (pregnant) women who use THC produce babies who do not *hear* voices, that is, NORMAL, Africans who *hear* voices naturally by birth will produce babies who do not *hear*, but it is the way Africans have to learn language so their babies will not learn! When you mix both populations in studies, it will appear incorrectly as THC producing mental retardation, when in fact it is only Africans who **forfeited** their natural need to *hear* voices (schizophrenia) to learn (otherwise slowed)... Once the incorrect inference is applied to Humans and sustained, they start producing babies *hearing* voices since birth, ie, equated to Africans! But in the Human species it is psychosis and the sense of Self will not develop if the Human individual does not grow without ever *hearing* voices!!!
The Hippie (hip-py) generation did produce a generation, despite their massacre, that produced or did not obstruct much these developments, computing, aircrafts, rock and roll, skyscrapers, internet, which required lots of individual individuals (pleonasm is valid) to achieve. Following generations would suffer from the inter-species confusion in studies and even everyday common knowledge.
Danilo J Bonsignore
*(C mon... I remember the smoking kangaroo pictures, but no animal can pick the plant, roll the cigar, light the fire, light the smoke, entertain it in its lungs, exhale it and repeat, ad libitum and for pleasure, so circus animals mimicking us are no refutation for this fact and it is a sufficient definition for Human).

Danilo J Bonsignore

Loading...